# Rescan Devices

**URL:** <https://forum.fxsound.com/t/rescan-devices/3415>\
**Category:** Share Feedback\
**Created:** [August 12, 2024, 8:55am UTC](https://forum.fxsound.com/t/rescan-devices/3415 "2024-08-12T08:55:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PD1108](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ccd318/32.png) [@PD1108](https://forum.fxsound.com/u/PD1108)\
**Post date:** [August 12, 2024, 8:55am UTC](https://forum.fxsound.com/t/rescan-devices/3415/1 "2024-08-12T08:55:40Z")

</div>

Sometimes I lose a device in FX, although it is connected. Can we have an option where FX rescans for connected devices

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![doolhoofd](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex030/user_avatar/forum.fxsound.com/doolhoofd/32/1131_2.png) [@doolhoofd](https://forum.fxsound.com/u/doolhoofd)\
**Post date:** [August 12, 2024, 2:44pm UTC](https://forum.fxsound.com/t/rescan-devices/3415/2 "2024-08-12T14:44:10Z")

</div>

Considering the amount of issues we’ve had with detections, I can agree this is a good idea.  
It would be great if we could find an optimal way to integrate it as a feature, which would be at once practical, simple, easy, quick, and efficient.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bvijay](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex030/user_avatar/forum.fxsound.com/bvijay/32/84_2.png) [@bvijay](https://forum.fxsound.com/u/bvijay)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2024, 5:04pm UTC](https://forum.fxsound.com/t/rescan-devices/3415/3 "2024-08-15T17:04:08Z")

</div>

FxSound checks for device connection changes through a timer logic. I will check if this can fail to detect devices and add the device scan option if required.
