# Feature request plus "hiss" issue

**URL:** <https://forum.fxsound.com/t/feature-request-plus-hiss-issue/3198>\
**Category:** Share Feedback\
**Created:** [June 17, 2024, 6:54am UTC](https://forum.fxsound.com/t/feature-request-plus-hiss-issue/3198 "2024-06-17T06:54:04Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![doolhoofd](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex030/user_avatar/forum.fxsound.com/doolhoofd/32/1131_2.png) [@doolhoofd](https://forum.fxsound.com/u/doolhoofd)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2024, 8:25pm UTC](https://forum.fxsound.com/t/feature-request-plus-hiss-issue/3198/21 "2024-06-23T20:25:25Z")

</div>

Your requests have officially been forwarded. 📧

> [@quartz](#):
>
> (that’s actually in fact another question…could the interface be compacted?)

Feel free to chime in:

> <https://github.com/fxsound2/fxsound-app/issues/25>
>
> Some forum members have voiced complaints about the UI, stating that they think …FxSound's main user inferface is too big, and some have requested adding an option to resize it.
> On this topic, it seems worth noting that this issue was already (at least partially) addressed by a drastic reduction of the size of the main Power On/Off button plus the move of all buttons to the top right corner of the UI since v1.1.20.0, and, that an "Expand/Minimize" button, which allows users to switch to a miniature/minimalist version of the UI, is already present at the top right corner of the UI as well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![quartz](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/6de8d8/32.png) [@quartz](https://forum.fxsound.com/u/quartz)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2024, 9:14pm UTC](https://forum.fxsound.com/t/feature-request-plus-hiss-issue/3198/22 "2024-06-23T21:14:59Z")

</div>

thanks. I don’t want to criticise code-work, but I did see an example of how the on button used to be…and…why??

the PCef interface above is more…standard? it can’t actually be resized, but it’s more regular layout (less blank space more interface). I guess the coders want to create a sort of brand image? but…brand image ‘less important than’ a practical layout 😛 if I was recommending an EQ program to someone, I wouldn’t say fx sound has a distinct layout, I’d have to say ‘excuse the layout but it can be a useful program’ “doh”

just minor suggestion…the dancing lights display is cool. but…winamp (classic layout) has a sort of stack system where components (playlist/EQ etc) can be reduced to a bar. in fact there is another downside of the dancing lights layout above the EQ. if you’re watching a movie, you don’t want a distracting sine wave display, but you might want the sliders on hand. there’s actually no way of displaying the app with the sliders but no dancing lights.

just some random thoughts

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![quartz](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/6de8d8/32.png) [@quartz](https://forum.fxsound.com/u/quartz)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2024, 9:25pm UTC](https://forum.fxsound.com/t/feature-request-plus-hiss-issue/3198/23 "2024-06-23T21:25:22Z")

</div>

ps. I don’t want to be too luddite. I know everything is getting skinned now (personally I hate it) but I grew up on 90’s gui’s, where the interface looked like this (soundblaster mixer on Windows 98) as far as I’m concerned this is what things can look like 😛

![soundblaster-mixer](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex030/uploads/fxsound/original/2X/4/4b1b3f2a2d073e1e471261dd90cb0daff7ec78d4.jpeg)

this is what my winamp looks like

![winamp](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex030/uploads/fxsound/original/2X/5/593d0b1ff85881878432f15d0120b7517be18bd7.png)

that winamp skin is from 2005 I think, I’m still using it now

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![quartz](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/6de8d8/32.png) [@quartz](https://forum.fxsound.com/u/quartz)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2024, 11:41am UTC](https://forum.fxsound.com/t/feature-request-plus-hiss-issue/3198/24 "2024-06-27T11:41:54Z")

</div>

thank you - by the way another small suggestion

standard interface has the two diagonal arrows for compact interface, and the x which sends it to the taskbar. could this x be a different symbol or something - x is usually close application, but the x actually sends it to the system tray, just slightly confusing as you think you’re going to be closing the app but it doesn’t, and also it’s hesitant to press the x, because if you do want to send it to the system tray, you need to click an icon that your brain tells you closes it 🙂

in fact is it possible to have 3 symbols in the top right…one to change between standard/compact, one to send to taskbar and another one to actually close it. actually that’s 4 icons…std/compact, minimise, system tray, close.

at the moment unless I’m not aware of it, the only way to close the app is to x to system tray, and then find the icon in the system tray, right click and then exit - a few mouse clicks

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![doolhoofd](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex030/user_avatar/forum.fxsound.com/doolhoofd/32/1131_2.png) [@doolhoofd](https://forum.fxsound.com/u/doolhoofd)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2024, 4:11pm UTC](https://forum.fxsound.com/t/feature-request-plus-hiss-issue/3198/25 "2024-06-27T16:11:58Z")

</div>

Point taken.

As a daily user, I’d argue that the added complexity of an extra button, would not be worth the gains.  
All programs have their own controls, buttons and settings with which users need to get acquainted, and FxSound is not the only Windows program that minimizes to tray with X instead of closing completely.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![quartz](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/6de8d8/32.png) [@quartz](https://forum.fxsound.com/u/quartz)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2024, 11:29pm UTC](https://forum.fxsound.com/t/feature-request-plus-hiss-issue/3198/26 "2024-06-27T23:29:17Z")

</div>

I guess. they are confusing as well 🙂 x should actually x it, although I know often x doesn’t actually x it. I mean all you’d need, is the compact/regular icon (you could possibly argue that if there was less unused real estate space, you wouldnt need the compact view?), a diagonal arrow going to the bottom left for taskbar (minimize) a diagonal arrow going bottom right (for system tray) and the x. shrug

winamp does it with a sort of ‘stack system’ layout - the EQ and playlist windows for winamp are ‘collapsable’. maybe the dancing lights could have a ‘collapse’ icon (collapse/un collapse)which would result in the full view layout being halfway between normal and compact

![winamp2](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex030/uploads/fxsound/original/2X/d/dcddfaba560e3cfe21438fb4ee67959c78c6cf3d.png)

[Previous page](https://forum.fxsound.com/t/feature-request-plus-hiss-issue/3198.md?page=1)
