# 2 points of feedback.

**URL:** <https://forum.fxsound.com/t/2-points-of-feedback/6347>\
**Category:** Share Feedback\
**Created:** [March 11, 2026, 3:22pm UTC](https://forum.fxsound.com/t/2-points-of-feedback/6347 "2026-03-11T15:22:28Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 14

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Inoshiro](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/a9adbd/32.png) [@Inoshiro](https://forum.fxsound.com/u/Inoshiro)\
**Post date:** [June 5, 2026, 8:09am UTC](https://forum.fxsound.com/t/2-points-of-feedback/6347/14 "2026-06-05T08:09:47Z")

</div>

Uh-huh. And ‘signed zero’ much like anything we use to model reality, is a model of reality – not the reality itself.

0 is 0. There is no such thing as +0 and -0. Just because we can make an algorithmic mathematical logic system that can model +0 and -0, does not mean those concepts exist. The concept of flat Earth is a concept, and it doesn’t exist either.

Sure, there are computer models that differ – but they are just models. They do not reflect reality.

(A general aside about science; they don’t call astronomy “telescope science” – but they do call information science “computer science” … the computer is just a tool that a scientist in that discipline uses; it is not the be-all-end-all truth. Telescopes aren’t what define stars. Computers aren’t what define information)

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.fxsound.com/t/2-points-of-feedback/6347)._
